Well, this video is not technically a CNN report. It was produced by Suroosh Alvi of VBS.TV, but CNN is hosting Part 1 (Part 2 is here). So it's close enough.
Anyways, a friend forwarded me this video report and I must admit my ambivalence towards the overall tone. It's really geared towards the regular man on the street. The narrator takes extreme liberty in describing this most sacred rite in Islam, at one point comparing the crowds performing tawaaf to a mosh pit, but so be it. Such are the times we live in.
At the same time, he seemed generally apologetic in presenting the Hajj rites to his non-Muslim audience. For example, I found it odd how he expressed his concern that the airplane scene where all the passengers were chanting the Talbiyya made them look like a bunch of terrorists. Also, why did he mention the Filipino stewardesses and how they wished they were anywhere else in the world?
And when describing Madina, he talked about the camels and malls and oh yeah, there's also this cool looking mosque called the Prophet's Mosque. Huh? Isn't that the ONLY reason for going to Madina? And what about that tiny little detail of our Prophet (saw) being buried there? No mention. The stopover in Madina was all about getting into some 'meditative state'.
And since I'm all about picking on my brother Suroosh, it would've been nice if he had mentioned that the Ka'bah was built by Prophet Abraham (as). After all, he is the patriarch for the three main monotheistic faiths.
Maybe I'm reading too much into the flow of his piece, but I simply didn't care for his vibe.
He seems to have taken the Orientalist approach of communicating the Hajj experience to the Western public. He (and by extension, his audience) represent the world of sanity and civility while the millions of heathen pilgrims fill the role of the unsophisticated 'Other'. Clamoring on bus rooftops, jostling for position in front of the Kaaba, sleeping on the streets of Mina - these are the bedraggled masses hopelessly littering the sacred grounds of Mecca.
In addition to his questionable tone, I wanted to also make some corrections:
1. He says that video recording is strictly prohibited in the sanctuary of Mecca and so he secretly recorded his video footage and smuggled it out. Sure, if you're walking around with a huge camera on your shoulder, like those used by cameramen working for broadcast networks. But tiny digital cameras have become so ubiquitous that the Saudi authorities basically turn a blind eye. That's what allowed me to record this and this. And I recorded both videos in the open without any need for sneaking the footage out of Mecca.
2. The fancy high-rise hotels that shocked and disappointed the narrator are NOT solely for the super rich. In fact, most of the guests staying in those hotels are regular folks who are staying there via discounted rates afforded by their Hajj/Umrah group. And even for the regular guest (like me), the average cost per night ranges from $120 to $150 for a double room, hardly the scope of the rich and famous.
3. And our video host makes another mistake when he claims that the super rich take those rooms in order 'to pray from the confines of their rooms', as if to avoid the dirty company of the masses found around the Holy Mosque. That may be said of the Royal Palace, reserved for Saudi royalty and visiting dignitaries, that overlooks the Haram, but the pilgrims staying in the surrounding hotels have come from all around the world for the sole purpose of standing in front of the Ka'bah. Not sure who he met that was praying from within his/her hotel room.
Near the end of the second part, he describes the scene of pilgrims lining the streets in their makeshift tents and plastic mats as apocalyptic. Sure, I guess it may come off as a bit dreary and morbid from the confines of an air-conditioned bus. But in reality, when one moves away from the five-star accommodations afforded to pilgrims coming from the West and walks the streets with the 'regular' pilgrim, one only senses joy and elation. Thankfully, both times I was blessed to make the Hajj, I was able to get a taste of the more simplistic Hajj and I would most definitely not describe it as apocalyptic.
WAW
5 days ago
8 comments:
The best CNN coverage of Hajj was when Riz Khan did it all those years ago. At that time it was truly in the spirit of exploring something new with an open mind.
Now it has become regular to see Hajj on tv and so these people took the 'sensationalist' approach - and spoiled it. I agree with all your criticisms.
Uugh...I agree with mezba it sounds like the narrator just wanted to "sensationalize" his take on Hajj by adding some "snarky" elements into it. Nowadays unfortunately people will only show interest to whatever's the lowest common denominator form of attention. Simply explaining about Tawaaf isn't enough anymore it seems; now you have to compare it to something from Western pop culture like mosh pits because people are too intellectually lazy to learn and understand the significance of Tawaaf on its own merits. And I can't believe he himself equated the chanting of Talbiyah to terrorism!! If his viewers didn't make that connection themselves before they will now! It would be like me, a Muslim woman, joking about hiding bombs under her "burka" in front of nonMuslims. It's not something meant to be taken as a joke.
BTW I just wanted to mention something to you Brother Naeem about taking camera phones within Haram precincts in Makkah/Madinah. From my experience I have often been prevented from bringing in such phones into the precincts by lady guards. At one point I did have to sneak one in by hiding it in my daughter's pant pocket (because of one experience of almost getting lost in Madina, I now carry the phone with me to contact hubby as soon as I exit the masjid). Meanwhile my husband told me his cell phone never got confiscated from him. I wonder why the discrepancy between male and female worshippers carrying cell phones into the Haram precincts?
AA-
@Mezba, yes I vaguely recall the Riz Khan coverage and being excited about it. Good stuff.
@R, the problems with camera-phones is only in Madina where women and men pray in separate halls and have separate entrances. In Mecca there is no such restriction, since men and women basically enter from the same doors.
Interesting post. Riz Khan certainly did a much better job. However, I must point out that $120 to $150 is a bit expensive for the vast majority of people even for Saudis - I think.
Also, most hotels raise the prices during "business" season. But, the developments did have a considerable impact on raising the hotel prices. That being said I do agree with your criticisms.
AA- Anon,
Yes, $150 is definitely out of the range for the vast majority of pilgrims coming from the impoverished Muslim world (Africa, Bangladesh, Yemen, etc.)
However, the presenter and his audience are from the West where paying $100 or so is normal for a nice hotel room. So I'm considering the source of the statement when saying that those hotels are NOT for the super rich, like something found in upscale Manhattan or Paris.
Also, the raised prices in past few years are more from the expansion construction around the Haram where so many hotels have been torn down. Supply and demand laws have caused prices to rocket, not so much the luxury-factor of some of these fancy hotels.
Thanks for your comments!
Challenge the narrator, send him your post/thoughts, ask him to go back and do it again but with a different "lens" (figuratively) :)
I'm humbled you called me your friend
:)
Well, you can't expect CNN to rock our chairs. It's CNN.
Well you cant expect CNN to rock our chairs. It's CNN.
Post a Comment